>
b694f6d7beba39c3ea1eaba471e90e07db03488c

Transmigration and racism Some ideas ... What's soul.

 


1.


We have been talking about reincarnation for a long time.  The point is, the departed soul is reborn.  Almost every philosophy accepts soul and rebirth, except for a single semic philosophy.  But there is one more thing in this rebirth.  The point is that people are born out of nationalism  People born with this national memory can tell exactly about their previous birth.  We all know that we are reborn people.  He who is born of racism is also a reborn man in our opinion.  If he can remember pre-birth, then why can't we?  If racism is possible, then why not everyone?


 The first thing to write about this is to draw some examples.  Some of the Buddhist monasteries in Nepal, Bhutan, Tibet, Ladakh, etc., have to be discussed as the opening words of that example.  That is, there is a custom in these monasteries that the head lama of a monastery leaves some indication of where he will be born in the next birth before his death.  Other lamas after his death

 He found the reincarnated child and brought it to the monastery.  He was then declared the next chief lama.  The place of rebirth is usually within a radius of 200-300 km.  But that is not to say that it is not born thousands of kilometers away.  Although such examples are few, they are not uncommon.


 In 1974, a Tibetan lama, Thubten Yesha, indicated that he would be born in distant Spain.  As such, a group of lamas led by Lama Jopar arrived in Spain.  After much searching, they identified a six-year-old boy named Osel on the outskirts of the Spanish city of Granada as the reincarnated Thubten Yesha.  Ocel is shown the items used by Thubten, and Ocel easily identifies them.  Osel was first brought to Nepal in 198 with the permission of Osel's parents.  From there it was taken to Tibet.




 The tenth Panchen Lama of Tibet died in 1989.  After a six-year search by the current Dalai Lama, in a village 300 km from Lhasa, a boy named Gedhun Choekkinaika was identified as the tenth reincarnated Pancham Lama.  He could not be made a lama for the oppression of the Chinese government.  The current lama is ‘Gaiyaken Nerbu’.


 Presumably, a lama from Nepal, Tibet or Ladakh indicated before his death that he would be born in Palestine.  In search of him, wise men like Lama went to Palestine.  They identify the baby Jesus as the new life received by the reincarnation of the dead lama.  The Lamas considered it reasonable to keep Jesus and Mother Mary in a Buddhist monastery in Alexandria, believing that the labor of bringing the baby Jesus so far would not be tolerated.


 Here are a few examples.  The question is why not everyone is racist.  I have not found the answer in at least any scripture.  The answer can be found by relying on one's own curiosity and reasoning.  For example, well-known Western scholars believe that there is no species of soul other than man.  Hindu philosophy and Hindu philosophy are based doctrines, but they do not accept that, on the contrary, they admit that there are souls in many living beings.  It is said that eighty-four lakhs did not penetrate but human birth is found.  That is, it is acknowledged that there are eighty-four million types of living beings on earth.  Therefore, after the death of a human being, the genocide of a person depends on the genius he will appear in.  Because after being born again, if he is not born in the class according to his ability to speak, is it possible for him to be informed as a nationalist?  And speaking of class, we mean the only human race.  It may not be possible to remember the previous birth if we keep on changing again and again.  So the first condition of being a nationalist is to leave the human body and come back to human life and become human again.  However, after spending more days after death, it is not possible to remember the pre-memory even if it comes directly to the human body.  So the time interval between renunciation and rebirth is also a big factor.


 Then comes the place context.  It has been observed that most of the racists have come from environmentally and linguistically close areas.  Although one or two are far away, there are more people born near them.  In this case, the explanation is that if the environment, language, customs, culture and climate are the same, it seems to be more convenient for him to express the memories of old life.  As a proof of this, it can be said that nationalism is not seen among the followers of Semite philosophy at all.  The reason is that the environment, customs and culture of these ideologues stand in the way of nationalism.


 Now the question is to remember the previous birth, what is his logical answer?  I am trying to answer in very few words as the answer is very long and it is not possible to write in full.  If we want to know about this, first of all we have to say the theory of arrival and departure of living beings.  I am trying to convey that according to the scriptures.


 Nationalism is just a matter of the soul.  The same soul body is only changed.  The scriptural explanation of racism is not correct without a little discussion of the Sutra Atma.  So, first of all, we need to look for some theories about the definition of soul.  The latest best scribe, Yagguru Shankaracharya, says in verse 127 of his book 'Vivek Churamani', 'One who knows the present or the lack of all of the intellect and intellectual endowments in the state of waking, dreaming and dormant, and' ego.  In wisdom, this soul that is present as a witness, says in verse 126, who sees everything himself, but whom no one sees, no;  Who proves the intellect, the soul, the senses to be conscious, but there is much more time given by the racharya about the intellect, the soul or the senses which the soul of the soul to work with.  There is no need for that here.  But he said one more thing.  The saying is, 'Do not do anything with the soul or be deranged.

  Let us give a couple of examples related to the soul from the Upanishads.  Verse 4 of the Ish Upanishads says, ‘Even though the tree is one and motionless, it does not attain more speed than the mind, the gods or the yee.  Because he goes before everyone else.  This Brahman or Atma transcends all other fast moving forces.  Vitality holds all the power in the world since it was founded on this blog.  That is, the soul is related to the soul.  Verse 9 of the Katha Upanishads speaks of what happens to the soul after death.  Here it is said, 'After leaving the body, according to their own deeds and knowledge, some souls enter the body for the purpose of penetration, that is, they are born as living beings in the Venus-sharpened union.  Some people feel like trees or stagnant.  It is said here that the trees also have souls.  However, many people think that the presence of the soul is normal if there is a certain number of souls.  In my opinion, as soon as a cell is created, life comes to that cell and only when a cell is formed in that formula, the soul can come there.  And if it weren't for that, unicellular organisms wouldn't exist on Earth.



 Shankaracharya and the Upanishads say the same thing about the soul.  This soul is the fastest of all, but impassive.  Then we will see what the Gita says about the soul.


 Verse 19 of the Sankhya Jaig of the Srimad-Bhagavatam Gita says that the soul is never born, dies, is born and will not be born again in the future.  The soul is Oz, Eternal, Eternal and Purana.  Even if the body is destroyed, it is not destroyed. '  Verse 23 of the same chapter says that weapons cannot pierce, cannot burn, cannot moisten water and air cannot dry it.  Verse 24 says that this soul is inseparable, indestructible, inviolable and hopeless.  It is everlasting, stable, immovable, and everlasting. '  Verse 26 states, ‘The death of the born person is inevitable and the rebirth of the dead person is certain.  There is a slight deviation from the Ish Upanishads.  Verse 24 of the Gita says that the soul is stable or immobile.  Most likely, the position of the body is mentioned in the Gita.  But the immortality of the soul is recognized in all scriptures, it must be said.  Why and how does this soul emanate from the body?  I will try to find the answer to this question.

Now I will discuss some things about Samkhyamat.  Samkhya philosophy says that the soul has nothing to do with desire.  The soul is transcendent - therefore it is impossible to bind the soul by the religious desire of the intellect.  According to Buddhism, the soul is stable and desire is not stable because there is no one.  So according to Buddhism, the bond of the soul is not perfect.  According to Samkhya, the soul is eternal and true, so it is not 'fleeting'.  By the way, according to the ephemeral Buddhists, the whole work is fleeting, the material is fleeting.  In that sense everything is fleeting.  According to Hindu scriptures, nothing is said to be fleeting.  Samkhya philosophy says that action is impossible without reason.  Therefore, the exodus of the soul and the remembrance of the nation is not without a cause, it must be admitted.  The main theme of Samkhya philosophy is nature, where the equilibrium of Sattva, Rajah and Tamah is mentioned.  That is, nature is the sum of these three qualities.  The first consequence of the nature of the world is greatness.  The consequence of greatness is arrogance.  The consequences of arrogance are twofold.  Panchatanmatra and the two types of senses Panchatanmatra are the gross panchabhutas from form, taste, smell, touch and sound, such as kshiti, water, energy, air and sky.  The external senses are called the sense organs.  There are five types of organs.  Namely, speech, hands, feet, penis and anus.  There are also five types of senses - eyes, ears, nose, tongue and skin.  Out of these ten senses, the number of senses, including the mind, is eleven.  And at the root of all this is Atma or Brahman.  It is said in verse 1 of the third chapter of Samkhya philosophy that when the living entity leaves this body and takes on transmigration, then the seed of the body goes along with the subtle ghosts.  In verses 3 and 4 it is said, ‘Souls pass away when the living entity passes away.  The senses go with him.  It is said in verse 7 of Samkhya philosophy that he returns to this world only after he has finished his fruit.  The theory of arrival and departure of Samkhya philosophy is as follows.



 It is said in the Srimad-Bhagavatam Gita (3: 42/43) that the senses are considered the best in the body.  The mind is better than the senses, the intellect is better than the mind, and the soul is better than the intellect.  Death is very well described in the Brahma Sutras.  Verses 1 to 6 of the second verse of the fourth chapter of this book say that for a dying Sehi, the first thing that comes to mind is Dhagendriya or sentence action.  Not only Bageyi, then all the senses are absorbed in the mind by dissolving the scholarship.  Then the mind melts into the soul by dissolving its scholarship.  Then, as a last resort, the soul merges in the soul or Brahman by dissolving its vocation.  The subtle panchabhuta with the soul or the subtle sense organs become the body seed and remain in union with the soul.


 That is, we can assume that the activities of the ten senses are stored in our brain as memories.  And all these senses merge one by one and leave the body after taking shelter in the soul with the help of mind and intellect.  So the soul dies with all the memories.  It can be said that the bayadata of all work is stored in Brahman or Atma.  Now we have to say something about the theory of arrival.


  A long time ago I saw an English movie called ‘The Body’.  It is seen that the sperm is making a cell in the mother's womb by piercing the ovum.  It can be said that an attempt is immediately becoming a creation of life.  In my opinion, then the soul is occupying that cell with all its memory power, then at a certain time from the mother's womb to see the earth.  Slowly.  The last lost sense will appear in the previous birth and the last will be seen. The first sense that was lost or can be said to be the last will appear.  What does the soul do after the earthly death of man?  At that time, when all his bonds were severed, he became anxious to hold his body again  He then does not hesitate to leave the judgment and assume any body, at least in the case of the soul of the common man.  She then went crazy to be born.  Remember, but only if death.  Not all bonds are severed.  Maya’s bond cannot be severed.  And for that Maya wants to come back as soon as possible to the world of form, juice, smell.  And this is where it becomes apparent.  The duty of God or Creator.  The Creator arranges to receive the human being who was not known at that time, but goes from the human being to the human being and is born again as a human being.  And such people have a strong possibility of being 'racist'.


 Scholars like Shankaracharya, Sri Krishna, Kapila, Bedavasya, etc. have all admitted that the soul dies with all its memories except a little nineteen-twenty.  Or it can be said that he has all the memories stored even after his mortal death.  So even after being born again, those memories are stored in him.  Where is this stored memory?  The answer is that all the memories are stored in the body where the soul is.  In my opinion the position of the soul in the body is in the brain.  Because our brain carries our memory, the position of the soul also has to be accepted in the brain.  We humans, a little more advanced than normal, can use around eight percent of our brain.  So what is ninety-nine percent?  Depending on modern science, some answers can be found.




 However, it should be noted that scientists have not yet been able to accurately determine the capacity of the brain.  However, in their opinion, they say that even if 3 million luddhi hours or 342 years of continuous video is stored on the memory card of the brain, the memory space of a very expensive computer called the brain will not be filled.  Doppel Beber, a professor of psychology at Northwestern University in the field of research on brain memory space, noted that the human brain has about 100 million or one billion neurons.  Is.  Each neuron has formed a union with one thousand Brahmans, the mathematical number of which will be more than one trillion.  Even if each neuron contains one memory, the memory space will never run out in a person's lifetime.  One is that a neuron can hold innumerable memories.  Paul Smriti Reber added that if the brain holds memory according to a state-of-the-art digital sense video recorder, it would take 300 years for that memory to be broadcast continuously on a TV.  He also says that the memory capacity of the brain is at least 2.5 petabytes or one million gigabytes or one million gigabytes.  Not a single proven nama.  Relying only on ideas.  In these words, it is only a glimpse of the memory capacity of the brain.  It is not possible to estimate how many times the actual capacity is more than the estimated number.  Of course, scientists have used that word to expose it.  However, we can only guess at our brains and memories of past lives.  Isn't it?  So far, according to scripture and science, e-soul memory has been discussed.  It was seen that the source of our memory is that soul or Brahman.  Or it can be said that the abode of Brahman, our brain is the base of all our memories.  Those who can remember or say that memory are 5 national memories.  Why can't we be racist?  If we think a little, we can see that we are all racist.  Usually those who are ✉ racist, they can say everything knowingly or consciously  E We all have a time when we are asleep.  = A lot of times we see, a lot of people and places, which are very familiar and feel like their own.  What is the reason for this?  This is because, in our sleep, we go back to our past through the array of memories from our brain.  That's when we see the antecedents.  As such, we are all but racist, although we do not see it consciously.


 In the final episode, I would like to know two contradictory things.  In the forest period of the Mahabharata, we see that after spending a lot of time in places like Paramaradhya Srikrishna Yatrasayang Grihamuni, Badrikashram etc. and after passing five births, he came to the present birth and said all the previous things.  Arjun also knew about the past.  So the question naturally arises that after a long time, can it be racist?  As a general example, it can be seen that after a short period of time, there is a national memory.  Now about the recent period.  Sri Sri Thakur Ramakrishna told Vivekananda that the day he knew who he was, he would no longer be here.  But did Swami Vivekananda become a nationalist before he died?  As much as I say or write in my own opinion, the matter is really confusing.  Only God can tell the truth.



Reviews System WIDGET PACK

#buttons=(Accept !) #days=(20)

Our website uses cookies to enhance your experience. Learn More
Accept !
Loading...