Playing with the minds of young people in World War II

Circumstances make people the devil or better. That Benality of Evil. Satanism is a trivial matter. Can come in people at any time. But there is controversy over this Stanford Prison Experiment. Many complained that, as an experimenter, he had instructed the guards in Zimbabwe to be more and more oppressive. So that the results of his tests may be manifested, and he may proclaim them. Zimbarde did not say anything about instructions or persuasion. However, he has also admitted it in a certain way. Wrote, “When needed, I could not adequately monitor the test. The result was human suffering. I'm sorry for that. Even today I apologize for providing help to that inhumanity. 2003. America has occupied Iraq. President Saddam Hussein has fled. His captives are being held at Abu Ghraib prison, 32 kilometers west of Baghdad. Unspeakable oppression on them. From obstruction to excretion to being forced to perform naked sex. The fame of the American military. Blessed and country journalism. Pictures of barrel torture outside the prison. Shown by CBS News. Noise all over the world. America or a civilized country? He is in the country President George W. Bush. His administration first tried to cover up the matter. Couldn't. The commission of inquiry is to be set up. Zimbarda was called in as an expert. He said it takes time for prison guards to be oppressive. 2006 He authored a book, The Lucifer Effect: Understanding the Heart, Good People, Evil, about the Stanford Prison Experiment. Milgram and Kimbarda's experiments revolve around novels and movies. Two pictures were made in 2015. The Stanford Prison Experiment by Kyle Patrick Alvarez and The Experimenter by Michael Almereda. The second film is of course about the Milgram test. The first film shows the mental torture of prisoner 712. She has to get rid of lice in her hair. So he is being told to be quick lanto. And psychologists are still turning to Stanley Milgram's tests. Just five years ago, Patrick Haggard, a professor at University College London, conducted the test. The science journal ‘Nature’ called the experiment ‘Thrally Modern Milgram. In the test, Haggard placed the agent and the victim on either side of the table in pairs. Experimenter standing next to the table. If the victim makes a mistake, there is an arrangement to pay five pence to the agent on his behalf. If the agent does not like the punishment, he can also give the victim an electric shock. There are two switches in front of it. Nothing happens when you press one switch, electric shock of the victim when you press the other. A real shock. But within the tolerance of the victim. Whether the agent will give a shock will depend on the instructions of the experimenter. The test started after such an arrangement. The victim made a mistake. He was released with a five pence fine. Some victims did not get it.
In any case, the agent is clearly instructed by the experimenter to press the switch between the two switches that can shock the victim. In any case, the experimenter turned his face away. He told the agent to press either of the two switches. That is, the agent shocked or did not shock the victim. This time the bell rang a few milliseconds later. The agent was told to notice the time interval between his switch tapper and the bell market. It turned out that in all the cases where the experimenter had turned his face to the other side, the agent had voluntarily pressed the switch, in all cases the agent seemed to have rung the bell hours earlier. And in all the cases where the experimenter has shown the agent directly, which switch should be pressed, in all cases the agent is saying, the bell has rung. In fact, in both cases there is a time lag between the switch and the bell market. Then why is the agent saying, the bell rang before and after? That's the agent's fault. The mind acts voluntarily and reacts quickly. Delays acting on the instructions of others and his reaction. Haggard has seen the brain EEG of agents, the mind is less responsible for the work if it works under the direction of others. That is the rule. This is what Milgram wanted to show him. Isn't that so? Come back in the context of wonder. Why was the incredible grass curious about Hannah Aren's writing?