>
b694f6d7beba39c3ea1eaba471e90e07db03488c

Playing with the minds of young people in World War II

Playing with the minds of young people in World War II

On May 11, 1850, he was arrested in Buenos Aires, Argentina, by the Israeli police. Private operation. This is because the Argentine government has previously opposed the extradition of a number of war criminals, citing the country's sovereignty. After his arrest, Eichmann was flown from Buenos Aires to Jerusalem on an Israeli plane after being drugged and paralyzed. May 23, 1980. Israeli Prime Minister David Benjamin announced in the Israeli parliament, the Knesset, that "Ikhman is in our hands. We will judge him. After many days, the world got the news of the lost Aikhman. There was shouting all over Argentina. Many countries joined the protest. Crime in one country, arrest of a criminal in another country, his trial in another country — what a matter! It was up to the United Nations. Israel somehow managed to deceive. April 11, 1971. Eichmann's trial began in a special court in the city of Jerusalem. In that city to write the news of the hearing of about 500 reports from all over the world. Hannah came to report on behalf of the American weekly The New Yorker. The report was published in the magazine in two installments. December 15, 1971. Ghaghasana after the trial. The judges gave the verdict which had been predicted earlier. The death penalty. The appeal was made to the Israeli Supreme Court. May 29, 1972. The Supreme Court dismissed that appeal. After that beg for mercy. Eichmann's wife and brother begged Israeli President Isaac Ben-V for Eichmann's life. May 31. The president dismissed the petition. Aikhman was hanged at midnight on June 1. Before going to the gallows, the pastor came to teach Eichmann the Bible. The prisoner sent him back, he had no time to waste. He would rather ask the prison authorities for a bottle of red wine. And when it came, the halfway point was over. He was taken backwards to the gallows. Once he said, the rope hurts. When the warden wanted to press the black cloth on his face, he said, it is not necessary. He shouted, “Long live Germany, long live Argentina. In the report, all the 500 journalists did it. But while writing the report, Hannah added a different dimension to it. Calling himself a philosopher, he insisted on the claim of philosophy. What? Which is in the subtitles of his most famous book. Yes, Benality of Evil. The insignificance of the devil. Is it possible to be a devil without being a devil? It is as if Hannah answered this question in a report published in The New Yorker. In his eyes, Ikhman is not ‘perverted’ or ‘sadistic’ (which is what Israel proved him to be), the groom. ‘Terrifyingly normal’ is a man. He is the ideal bureaucrat. He has always done the work of a bureaucrat. What is the job of a bureaucrat? Obey the recommendations of the superior and thus be promoted. This is how Ikhman arranged his career in the Nazi bureaucracy. In the description of Hannah, he is a devil, even if he is not a devil. His mind was detached from the reality of sinful deeds. He did not know what to do, because he could not see the real in the eyes of others. Sin was not caught in his eyes. Satanism is a trivial matter. In that case, we can do anything. As if ghee fell in the fire! Lakjan got up and read the report of Hana. According to many, Hana sang Safai on behalf of Aikhman. He tried to prove his innocence. Even Hannah's friends started booing. The exception is one. Stanley Milgram. Professor of Psychology at Yale University in America. Born into a Jewish family. That's why interest in the Holocaust is normal. He is also interested in Hannah's new theory. Did Aikhman and other Nazi officers just obey the order? In the trial of war criminal officers in the city of Nuremberg, the officers defended themselves on the same grounds. It's a matter of psychology. As a professor of that subject, Milgram wanted to look into the matter. In 1971 he planned an experiment. This year is the Diamond Jubilee of that experiment. June 16, 1971. The New Haven Register, the number one newspaper in the city where Yale University is located, is full of advertisements. ‘I want people to test my memory. You will get four dollars to spend one hour in our laboratory. Advertising works. Ellen Hundreds of Volunteers. Their role? Teacher. They will teach the students. What to teach? Matching words with words. After teaching once, he started reading. Then the students are punished if they make a mistake. An official will order the punishment. What is the punishment? Electric shock The amount of punishment for the student will also increase if he continues to make mistakes. 15 volts shock if the first mistake. 30 volts shock the next time you make a mistake. In this way the electric shock up to 450 volts increases. No one survives a shock of 450 volts. He dies. Long before that the students began to scream in pain as the amount of shock continued to increase. In fact, the person giving the order and the students — everything is in order. In English it is called 'fake'. And most importantly, the shock absorbing machine is fake. The boss and the students are all students of Milgram. There is no electric shock system in the shock machine. Everything is acting. The experiment is for teachers who have come to volunteer after seeing advertisements in newspapers. To check whether they follow the orders of the boss and go through fake shock. With the increase in the amount of fake shocks, the order of the boss will also change. First, when the amount of fake shock is low, if the command is, ‘Please continue, then the next steps will be like this:‘ The test tells you to continue, ‘You must continue,’ and you have no choice but to continue. Students who receive fake shocks will not sit in one room with teachers. So that the acting teacher does not feel the pain of screaming in pain after the fake shock Test results? Yes, it turned out, 85 percent of the teachers or volunteers went with a 450-volt shock to punish the student. The students continued to shock even after pretending to faint and die long before the 450-volt shock. Who are they? The common man of society. That is, the test results are clear. The human character is like a trained sarmeya. During the trial in Nuremberg, one Nazi officer after another would defend himself by saying, "Buffalo East Buffalo (commandment means commandment)." They are not the devil, they are ordinary people. The popular television program 'Sixty Minutes' in America invited Milgram to know the results of the test. "If the United States were to send people to the gas chambers to kill people, then there would be plenty of Americans to run the gas chambers," he explained. It is wrong for Nazi officers to think of Satan as satanic. Benality of Evil. Milgram provided experimental evidence for the theory that Hana put forward. 1983 Milgram wrote the results of his experiment in detail in the Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology. The response began. The report was written by Walter Sullivan, a well-known science journalist, in The New York Times. "Sixty-five percent in test blindly obeys order to inflict pain." One week later, an editorial was written on St. Louis Paste Dispatch's paper, citing Milgram and Yale University. Volunteers don't know that shock is fake. They are deliberately giving him an electric shock. Who or what gave permission to run such a test? The debate began. Milgram, a member of the American Psychological Association, under pressure from the policy. However, in 1974, he was awarded the Psychological Research Award by the American Association for the Advancement of Science. In 1974, Milgram wrote the book - Obedience to Authority: An Experimental View. If Milgram came down to do his experiment after reading the report of Aikhman's trial, then another person also did another test in his mind. Another contemporary is Philip George Kimbarda, a school friend from Milam. In 1981, he became a professor of psychology at Stanford University. That year was a storm in American political life. The Vietnam War is going on. Young people have to enlist in the US Army to be able to do that. They are dying in a war in the opposite half of the world. What is the benefit of that war? Young men and women in American colleges and universities are agitating over the question. Another news on him. The wound is offensive. American troops are carrying out unspeakable atrocities on the Vietnamese people. How do polite educated youths become oppressors? To find the answer to this question, he took the test in Zimbabwe. He also passed the exam this year. His experiment became known as the Stanford Prison Experiment. How's the test? August 15, 1971. Verbela. Police in the town of Alto fled to the west coast of the United States and knocked on the doors of some houses. When the householder opened the door, one young man from each house woke up. He was handcuffed and taken to the van. Neighbors peeked out the window. They are criminals! Mate 24 youths were brought in front of a jail. 'Stanford County Jail' written in large letters in Herding. It's a fake prison. In fact, the Department of Psychology at Stanford University has been classified as a prison. Inside is a six-foot or six-foot chamber. One cell at a time. Prisons are fake, just as young people are not criminals. They are guinea pigs for testing. He has been brought in to answer the advertisement in the newspaper. The volunteers were asked, what do you want to be - guard or prisoner? Almost everyone said that no one likes the guard, it is better to be a prisoner. At the end the role was determined by tossing coins. A few guards, the rest all prisoners. Prison superintendent himself in Zimbabwe. The beginning is the test. Although the guards have names, the prisoners do not have them, they are just numbers. The guards began torturing the prisoners to death. A bucket in the cell, leaving excrement in it. Responsibility to survive the stench. Sometimes the hands and feet of the prisoners were shackled. If he disobeys a little, he has a house of sticks. The prisoner on the second day. Rebelled. The guards threw Kalkamani to suppress it. Some prisoners are victims of insomnia. Prisoner No. 712 knocked on the door of the Soul and shouted, 'You don't understand. Inside, I'm burning to ashes. I want to be released. I can't stand it anymore. Another night, oh unbearable! ' The guards did not release him. The test was supposed to last 14 to 21 days. Six days later, Christina Maslak (later Zimbabwe's wife), a PhD student in psychology, told him, "You will be responsible for the emotional damage done to the captive youth. He stopped the test in Zimbabwe that day. Why did the guards become so cruel? Gimbarde explained. Power fuels. Of oppression. Power on the one hand, on the other. Helplessness. According to Zimbarda, the prisoners are helpless. The helplessness started from the time they were arrested by the fake police. The neighbors who peeked out and saw their van being anointed were embarrassed. The beginning of inferiority complex. It increased even more when they lost their names and became one by one. On the other side, the guards saw that the prisoners were helpless. This attitude empowered them. The helplessness of the prisoners helped the guards to become oppressors. Because the Vietnamese are helpless, the American army has tortured them unspeakably. People are slaves to the situation. When they get power, the powerful use that power over the helpless. No one is devil or good.




 Circumstances make people the devil or better. That Benality of Evil. Satanism is a trivial matter. Can come in people at any time. But there is controversy over this Stanford Prison Experiment. Many complained that, as an experimenter, he had instructed the guards in Zimbabwe to be more and more oppressive. So that the results of his tests may be manifested, and he may proclaim them. Zimbarde did not say anything about instructions or persuasion. However, he has also admitted it in a certain way. Wrote, “When needed, I could not adequately monitor the test. The result was human suffering. I'm sorry for that. Even today I apologize for providing help to that inhumanity. 2003. America has occupied Iraq. President Saddam Hussein has fled. His captives are being held at Abu Ghraib prison, 32 kilometers west of Baghdad. Unspeakable oppression on them. From obstruction to excretion to being forced to perform naked sex. The fame of the American military. Blessed and country journalism. Pictures of barrel torture outside the prison. Shown by CBS News. Noise all over the world. America or a civilized country? He is in the country President George W. Bush. His administration first tried to cover up the matter. Couldn't. The commission of inquiry is to be set up. Zimbarda was called in as an expert. He said it takes time for prison guards to be oppressive. 2006 He authored a book, The Lucifer Effect: Understanding the Heart, Good People, Evil, about the Stanford Prison Experiment. Milgram and Kimbarda's experiments revolve around novels and movies. Two pictures were made in 2015. The Stanford Prison Experiment by Kyle Patrick Alvarez and The Experimenter by Michael Almereda. The second film is of course about the Milgram test. The first film shows the mental torture of prisoner 712. She has to get rid of lice in her hair. So he is being told to be quick lanto. And psychologists are still turning to Stanley Milgram's tests. Just five years ago, Patrick Haggard, a professor at University College London, conducted the test. The science journal ‘Nature’ called the experiment ‘Thrally Modern Milgram. In the test, Haggard placed the agent and the victim on either side of the table in pairs. Experimenter standing next to the table. If the victim makes a mistake, there is an arrangement to pay five pence to the agent on his behalf. If the agent does not like the punishment, he can also give the victim an electric shock. There are two switches in front of it. Nothing happens when you press one switch, electric shock of the victim when you press the other. A real shock. But within the tolerance of the victim. Whether the agent will give a shock will depend on the instructions of the experimenter. The test started after such an arrangement. The victim made a mistake. He was released with a five pence fine. Some victims did not get it.


 In any case, the agent is clearly instructed by the experimenter to press the switch between the two switches that can shock the victim. In any case, the experimenter turned his face away. He told the agent to press either of the two switches. That is, the agent shocked or did not shock the victim. This time the bell rang a few milliseconds later. The agent was told to notice the time interval between his switch tapper and the bell market. It turned out that in all the cases where the experimenter had turned his face to the other side, the agent had voluntarily pressed the switch, in all cases the agent seemed to have rung the bell hours earlier. And in all the cases where the experimenter has shown the agent directly, which switch should be pressed, in all cases the agent is saying, the bell has rung. In fact, in both cases there is a time lag between the switch and the bell market. Then why is the agent saying, the bell rang before and after? That's the agent's fault. The mind acts voluntarily and reacts quickly. Delays acting on the instructions of others and his reaction. Haggard has seen the brain EEG of agents, the mind is less responsible for the work if it works under the direction of others. That is the rule. This is what Milgram wanted to show him. Isn't that so? Come back in the context of wonder. Why was the incredible grass curious about Hannah Aren's writing?
Reviews System WIDGET PACK

#buttons=(Accept !) #days=(20)

Our website uses cookies to enhance your experience. Learn More
Accept !
Loading...